Skip to content
Home » Football » Sevilla vs Getafe

Sevilla vs Getafe

Sevilla vs Getafe Expert Analysis

The upcoming match between Sevilla and Getafe on 2025-08-25 at 19:30 is poised to be an intriguing encounter. Historically, Sevilla has been a strong home side, often displaying aggressive attacking play, which could influence the goal-scoring potential of this game. Getafe, on the other hand, is known for its tactical discipline and defensive solidity. Given these dynamics, the betting odds suggest a high likelihood of an open and potentially high-scoring match.

Sevilla

LLDWD
-

Getafe

WWLDL
Date: 2025-08-25
Time: 19:30
(FT)
Venue: Ramon Sanchez Pizjuan
Score: 1-2

Predictions:

MarketPredictionOddResult
Over 1.5 Goals76.50%(1-2) 1.62
Both Teams Not to Score64.50%(1-2) 1.62
Under 2.5 Goals65.20%(1-2) 1.45

Betting Predictions

Over 1.5 Goals

With a prediction of 75.60, this betting option indicates that both teams are expected to score at least once. Sevilla’s attacking prowess combined with Getafe’s occasional lapses in defense could lead to multiple goals being scored. Key players to watch include Sevilla’s forwards who have consistently performed well in domestic fixtures and Getafe’s midfielders who might struggle against Sevilla’s pressing game.

Both Teams Not to Score

The odds for both teams not to score stand at 65.90, suggesting a moderate expectation of a goalless draw or one-sided result. This prediction leans on Getafe’s defensive capabilities and Sevilla’s occasional inconsistency in converting chances. If Getafe manages to keep a compact defense and Sevilla fails to capitalize on set pieces or counter-attacks, this outcome becomes plausible.

Under 2.5 Goals

With odds at 61.40, this bet reflects the possibility of a tightly contested match with limited goals. Both teams might adopt a cautious approach, especially if they are concerned with league standings or player fitness ahead of upcoming fixtures. Defensive strategies and midfield battles will be crucial in determining whether this prediction holds true.